Course Name | Classical Theories of Sociology |
Code | Semester | Theory (hour/week) | Application/Lab (hour/week) | Local Credits | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOC 221 | Fall | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
Prerequisites | None | |||||
Course Language | English | |||||
Course Type | Required | |||||
Course Level | First Cycle | |||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionGroup WorkCase StudyQ&ACritical feedbackLecture / Presentation | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) |
Course Objectives | To introduce the classical theories of sociology by discussing certain theorists whose works have shaped the discipline and to discuss the effects of them on the development of the discipline itself. |
Learning Outcomes | The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description | The course introduces classical theories of sociology. The main approaches in the discipline are examined through the discussion of the names like Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, George Simmel George Herbert Mead. |
Related Sustainable Development Goals |
| Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses | X | |
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Managment Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Required Materials |
1 | Presentation and overview of the course | |
2 | The Development of Sociological Theory | Dillon, M. (2020). Introduction to sociological theory: Theorists, concepts, and their applicability to the twenty-first century, pp. 1- 27. |
3 | The Development of Sociological Theory | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 2- 21. |
4 | Karl Marx I | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 43- 47. Dillon, M. (2020). Introduction to sociological theory: Theorists, concepts, and their applicability to the twenty-first century, pp. 31- 50. |
5 | Karl Marx II | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 48- 70. Dillon, M. (2020). Introduction to sociological theory: Theorists, concepts, and their applicability to the twenty-first century, pp. 51-70 |
6 | Karl Marx III | Hadden, R. W. (1997). Sociological Theory an Introduction to the Classical Tradition, pp. 39- 84. |
7 | Emile Durkheim I | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 76- 91. Dillon, M. (2020). Introduction to sociological theory: Theorists, concepts, and their applicability to the twenty-first century, pp.77- 97. |
8 | Midterm | |
9 | Emile Durkheim II | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 92- 111. Dillon, M. (2020). Introduction to sociological theory: Theorists, concepts, and their applicability to the twenty-first century, pp.98- 110. |
10 | Max Weber I | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 112- 126. Dillon, M. (2020). Introduction to sociological theory: Theorists, concepts, and their applicability to the twenty-first century, pp. 117- 128. |
11 | Max Weber II | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 127- 157. Dillon, M. (2020). Introduction to sociological theory: Theorists, concepts, and their applicability to the twenty-first century, pp. 129- 148. |
12 | Georg Simmel I | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 158- 174. |
13 | Georg Simmel II | Ritzer, G. 2010. Sociological Theory, pp. 174-188. |
14 | Phenomenological Sociology | Ferguson, Harvie (2006). Phenomenological Sociology: Insight and Experience in Modern Society, pp. 1- 15; 208- 211. |
15 | Evaluation of the Semester | |
16 | Final |
Course Notes/Textbooks |
| |
Suggested Readings/Materials |
|
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation | 1 | 20 |
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments | ||
Presentation / Jury | ||
Project | ||
Seminar / Workshop | 1 | 15 |
Oral Exam | ||
Midterm | 1 | 30 |
Final Exam | 1 | 35 |
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 2 | 65 |
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 1 | 35 |
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | ||
Study Hours Out of Class | 15 | 3 | 45 |
Field Work | |||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | |||
Portfolio | |||
Homework / Assignments | |||
Presentation / Jury | |||
Project | |||
Seminar / Workshop | 1 | 20 | |
Oral Exam | |||
Midterms | 1 | 28 | |
Final Exams | 1 | 39 | |
Total | 180 |
# | Program Competencies/Outcomes | * Contribution Level | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | To have the knowledge of classical and contemporary theories in sociology, and be able to comparatively analyze these theories. | X | ||||
2 | To have the knowledge of main methodological approaches in sociology as well as social research and data analysis methods. | |||||
3 | To have knowledge in the fields of general sociology, sociology of institutions, social structure and change, and applied sociology. | X | ||||
4 | To be able to determine the appropriate methods in the design of the planning stage and conclusion of a sociological project, individually or as part of a team. | |||||
5 | To be able to diagnose the social dynamics behind personal problems by using sociological imagination. | X | ||||
6 | To be able to define social problems at local, national, and global level, and offer new policies for solutions. | X | ||||
7 | To be able to apply commonly-used computer programs for data collection and analysis in sociological research. | X | ||||
8 | To be able to develop a socially responsible, scientific and ethical perspective regarding the collection, analysis, interpretation and presentation of data. | X | ||||
9 | To be able to analyze different aspects of the social world by drawing on the knowledge produced by other disciplines of the social sciences. | |||||
10 | To be able to constantly renew herself/himself professionally by following scientific and technological developments in sociology and social research. | |||||
11 | To be able to collect sociological data and communicate with sociologists and other social scientists in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1). | |||||
12 | To be able to speak a second foreign at a medium level of fluency efficiently. | |||||
13 | To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise. |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest